Enhancing Cyber Situational awareness through Active Defence Research Paper

Enhancing Cyber Situational aw areness through Active Defence - Research constitution ExampleThey include i. Visualization of Situation Awareness data/ information ii. Metrics iii. Dynamic adventure Assessment for Mission Assurance However, Cyber Situation Awareness is still considered a new field of research that made its mark with Dennings (1987, 2002) pioneering work on using expert systems to detect computer attacks in 1987, followed by a plethora of experiments thereafter. The early stage of experiments shaped the concept of tactical fusion, which was proposed by the JDL (Joint directors Laboratory) pretense in 1992. This model contains five functional levels such as 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4. It was published by Hall, and Llinas (1997). It focused solely on data management to prevent cyber attacks. In it, most of the tasks are turn on level 0, 1, and 4. Tadda finds JDL model as a bottom-up, data driven model (Figure 3). The significance of JDL model lies in the fact that it highl ights the significance of algorithmic techniques towards supporting situation awareness (Salerno, Hinman, & Boulware 2005). Figure 3 tactical Fusion/JDL Model Adapted from (Tadd 2008) Explanation From a simple point of view, SA refers to the knowledge about ongoing events in the cyber environments. According to Ensley (2000 3), SA defines three essential drivers which include perception, comprehension, and projection. As per Ensley, perceptions of cues (which he refers to as Level 1 SA) are fundamental, since in the absence of basic perception of important information the chance of wrongly visualizing the situation drastically increases. In support of this argument she cites a finding that showed 76% of SA errors of the pilots emanated from lack of perception of the required information (Jones & Ensley 1996). Comprehension on the other hand, refers to an outcome of how people interpret, associate, store, and retain information, and thus makes its place in SA carry through as Level 2 SA in Ensleys (1995c). The Level 3 SA, i.e., Projection helps operators to perform at the highest level of SA, since it enables the operators to forecast on situation events and its dynamics, Ensley (2000). Ensley further explains that SA is all about knowing what is going on, patch from a formal point of view it is all about the perception of the elements in the environment indoors a volume of time and space, the comprehension of their meaning and the projection of their status in the near forthcoming (Ensley 1995b 36). In a nutshell, Ensley consolidated the theoretical perspective of SA by adding human factors in it, thereby initiation a new horizon of developments towards achieving quality SA (Wickes 2008 397). Endorsement of the above view from a host of researchers (Ensley 1993, 1994 Ensley & Rodgers 1994 Ensley & Robertson 1996 and Endsley et al. 1998) highlighted the blase aspects of time, as the above view showed that both perception of time and temporal dynamics asso ciated with events play essential roles in the formulation of SA, and a critical part of SA involves understanding of the amount of time available in the occurrence of an event or in the course of an action. Such developments helped researchers to underpin time as an total part of Level 2