Question 1 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Question 1 - Essay ExampleThe electrocution was caused by ill-timed wiring. Edward, also a guest at the party, thought it would be amusing to dance on the garage capital. As he could not reach the roof unaided, he decided to use a radiator under(a) the window as a step. For some time, Alice had known that the radiator was loose. The radiator collapsed under Edwards weight and he stony-broke his leg in the fall. Question Advice Alice and Bert, who are both, being threatened with legal claims by Delia and Edward. A Glance at the Circumstance Based on the accustomed situation, i could say that both, Bert (the landlord) and Alice (the tenant) had committed mistakes resulting to the injuries suffered by Delia and Edward. With regard to Bert, he was the one who hired Charlies Electrics which presumably did not fix well the broken coruscation switch in Alices kitchen as Delia was electrocuted due to faulty wiring. Alice on the other hand, is somehow guilty of what happened to Edward. Edward actually suffered a broken leg later he tried to go to the garage roof using the radiator under a window which Alice knew to be loose. If only Alice reported the loose radiator to Bert for him to fix it, the contingency could have been avoided. As remote as the circumstance is concerned, it seems that Bert and Alice have failed to perform their respective obligations as the owner and tenant of the place. Analysis According to Markesinis and Deakin (1999, p.69), the element of calling is associated to the following query does the law recognize liability in the cited situation? The essence of this question is related to the duty attached to a landlord as far as the given situation is concerned. Under section 4 of the Defective Premises Act 1972, the landlord is induce to maintain or repair the premises under tenancy. He or she owes a duty to take mediocre care in all circumstances to all persons who can be affected by the defects of the premises (Defective Premises Act 1 972). This is to say then that Bert, as the owner of the first floor flat which Alice rented, has the obligation to make sure that nothing in the premises is defective that might cause any harm to any tenants. To take reasonable care would mean that Bert should have conducted an inspection in Alices playing area to check if there is something defective and to fix it immediately. Since Bert did not know about the loose radiator, it can be presumed that he did not exercise reasonable care to maintain the place. To note, it is not actually essential for the tenant to notify the landlord of the want of repair (Clements & Fairest, 1996, p.85). Nonetheless, Bert could not be made liable to Edwards flaw because the ultimate fault is attached to Alice. As the occupier of the place, Alice has the responsibility to take care of the premises. Taking care of the premises would mean that she should not do anything that could ravish the property and if she does, she will be held liable to it. Section 1 of the Occupiers Liability Act 1984 states that the occupier of a certain premises is obliged to take good care of the people who are in his or her premises especially if he or she knows of the possible danger his or her area might have. He or she has reasonable ground to believe that a person may go to the vicinity the danger and that the corresponding risk is one which necessitates some form of protection from the occupier. To note, Alice had known of the fact that